Law Essay

p The Law Process 1 RUNNING doubtfulness : The Law Process The Law Process in the 12 outraged Men[Name of Author][Name of School][Name of Professor][Course Number] The Law Process in the 12 angered Men12 angry men is a movie full of surprises cater by the 12 jurywomans who was to examine an eighteen-year obsolescent composition whom was accuse for killing his father . These jurors where mainly are on their middle-aged and basically , belongs to the middle class society . They were brought together to administer the case of the young men and to decide whether the incriminate go out be judged delinquent or non illegal . The male child s livelihood will dep peculiarity on the last of the 12 jurors if they ll had a unanimous finding of shamefaced and will be brought into electrical chair as a punishmentThe story ci rcles in the argument whether the boy will be automatically accused guilty without examining the incident . This was so , because they were handsome sure that the man was guilty because of the strong evidences presented by the testimonials of the old woman and the whatsoever other neighborhoodBut juror 8 could not just argue with the remain eleven jurors because for him , it is a sprightliness that they were talking in the board room . They might be wasting a life if ever they do a mis mob in the decision . He pointed out that they take for granted t know the real fairness so they induce in to cross-examine everything . It became a tragic for the juror 8 to allure the remaining eleven . afterwards having several clear-sighted discussions , though the eleven jurors showed strong argument that the boy must(prenominal) be guilty , little by little , at the end , they had a unanimous decision of not guiltyAt the crack of the boy , we fire strongly say that he do es , micturate the justice . in that loca! tion are several testimonies that don t very proved that he was guilty .

Personally , I was not comfortable with the gist of the mental testing . First , the exam was not made in a due process . If you ll banknote , the firm trial was imprintated . It was mostly composed of opinion of the jurors . But I very admire the courage of the juror 8 to go of what he believes was supposed to do . imprimatur , the jurors were just debase with the argument . All the juror 8 wants was to have a fair trial with the case . He wanted to first base hear the whole case forrader bringing angiotensin converting enzym e s life into death . But at the end , the trial seems to be a matter of choosing among guilty or not guilty . Maybe some of the jurors were just brought up the role and pressure , for at the end , they all decide to have a unanimous decision of not guilty After all , they still don t know the truth . On the side of the victim the trial was not fair for having that prompt decision . What if they boy really killed his father ? No wiz knowsThe law...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay